Cameras

Jun 142013
 

Having said good-bye to the Sony line, I’ve bought my first Canon. Among film enthusiasts, Canon and Nikon rank high, but I assumed they had no advantage with digital. I may have been wrong.

What made me look first at the Canon SX50 HS was its super-zoom: 50x, the equivalent of 1200mm (~50% more than the Sony HX-100v and 200v). What made me look twice was Linda Stokes, extraordinary bird photographer. When she blogged about the Canon and posted such incredible photos, I was hooked, though I pulled against the hook for a few months. I know an expert can make mediocre equipment shine just as someone inept can make great equipment look bad — it’s the mind more than the tool that matters.

As I looked more closely at Canon’s specs, the following negatives caught my attention:

  • Low resolution electronic view finder (EVF — the little eye piece)
  • Low resolution LCD screen
  • Switching between EVF and LCD isn’t automatic (a feature I’ve learned to love on the Sony)
  • No GPS

Any one of these could have been a deal-breaker. I’m trying mightily to overlook these flaws at the incredible range and reported image quality. There are other pluses, of course:

  • Polarizing filter available (separate purchase) — yeah!
  • Raw file format (an uncompressed, lossless storage format offering the most post-processing options)
  • Zoom framing assist sounds interesting (zooms out and back instantly for locating your subject)
  • Slow motion filming
  • Creative modes and filters

First impressions (more in a couple of weeks):

  • The grip is smaller than the Sony, which makes the Canon harder for me to carry and hold
  • The power button requires a strong press to turn on
  • I already miss Sony’s multi-point focus; Canon has a single point of focus
  • Menus and options are easy to step through
  • Low res of LCD is not an issue; EVF is just OK

Update: My first disappointment is ironic: exposure compensation isn’t available in Automatic mode. (The irony is that EC breaking led me away from Sony, the only manufacturer I’ve seen that smartly enables EC in Automatic).

Imaging-Resource review of Canon SX50 HS

 Posted by at 5:19 am
Jun 132013
 

My first digital camera was an Olympus I purchased at Costco more than 12 years ago. It was a pocketable point and shoot. After my second Olympus, I switched to Sony cameras with the HX-1, a super-zoom, and then the HX-10. My current digital camera is a Sony HX-100v and I have loved it well, though not long enough (10 days shy of 2 years).

Sony has provided me with incredible macro (close-up) capability coupled with a super-zoom. Each next Sony has pushed that zoom farther. The Sony HX-100v has a 30x zoom. More specifically it reaches the equivalence of an 810mm lens. Those DSLRs you see with the foot-long lens might only be 400mm. To buy the equivalent zoom for DSLR would cost more than a used car.

As Sony has evolved, it has added more useful features, such as GPS tagging to identify where a photo was taken. That was a feature I was indifferent to until I viewed a group of photos on a map with a single click. Cool.

Unfortunately, one component of my Sony HX-100v stopped working just over a year after I got the camera. This is the jog wheel which is used to change a variety of settings. As a result, although I have all the automatic functions as before, I have *none* of the manual functions. Understand that I love automatic features and rely on them 95% of the time. I don’t miss setting aperture and shutter speed, among others. However, one of my favorite features of the Sony died with the jog wheel: exposure compensation. EC allows me to step up or down, that is to slightly alter the automatic setting for a lighter or darker exposure. EC adds subtle but useful nuance to the automatic functions. I miss it every day. And I know that another photographer might never use EC. I’ve lived nearly a year without EC but now autofocus has become a little less reliable.

Each time I’ve upgraded, I’ve given the previous camera to my wife. I won’t burden her with this one, even knowing that it is 90% of an incredible camera. She’s understandably happy with the HX-10, a 20x zoom.

Moreover, each upgrade has been to the next Sony. In the two years I’ve had the 100v, the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V and Sony DSC-HX300/B have come out. I recently recommended the 200v to a friend who took it to New Zealand and loved the camera. (I’ve recommended other Sonys to several friends who have loved them.) I still think the 100v or 200v would be a great choice. However, though the Sony HX-300 pushes to 50x, I think Sony has made a mistake in also upping the megapixels. More megapixels are not better if the chip size doesn’t increase. Denser pixels mean more noise and image quality problems. I desperately want Sony to put one of the DSLR chips in a point and shoot zoom.

For the first time in a long time, my next camera won’t be a Sony. The early failure of the jog wheel stung me. The fact that repair prices started at $150 (for a $400 camera) stung me.

What will my new camera be? I’ll tell you later, but I’ll say that its major draw is even more zoom. And its negatives are many — it’s going to have to impress me to truly replace my Sony.

 Posted by at 9:25 am
Apr 292013
 

Stephen Ingraham works for Zeiss, possibly the best manufacturer for optics. He knows what he’s writing about. I agree with his 9 points in the linked article. A good super-zoom point and shoot camera is more than enough camera for most photographers. (No flames from professionals or aficionados, please.)  I’ve loved using Sony for years and currently use the HX100v (superseded by the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V ). This year, I expect to upgrade to one of the following:

Birding with a Point & Shoot Camera.by Stephen Ingraham on January 15, 2013

 Posted by at 11:46 am
Feb 022013
 

My favorite bird photographer, Lillian Stokes, reviews the Canon PowerShot SX50 HS, a camera I’ve been considering. My question is whether this really beats the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V. The Sony has higher resolution viewfinder (EVF) and LCD on the back, which make a difference while taking photos. However, I’m disappointed by the lack of sharpness in some zoom shots, especially cropped. Stokes’ sample shots are quite impressive (no surprise — she could make an Instamatic impressive). Keep in mind with any super-zoom that you may not be able to hold the camera still enough, despite image stabilization. In addition to Stokes’ suggestion in the article, don’t hesitate to lean against something stable, such as a tree, wall, or car. peace, mjh

STOKES BIRDING BLOG: Canon SX 50 HS for Bird Photography: I love this camera!

Warning! Reading this blog post could cost you money. I just got the new Canon SX 50 HS point and shoot super-zoom camera and I love it. It’s in my right hand, my Canon 1D Mark IV with the 300mm lens and 1.4 teleconverter is in my left hand. The SX 50 HS has a 12.1 megapixel back-illuminated CMOS sensor, DIGIC 5 image processor, image stabilization, ISO 80-6400. The focal length when optical and digital zoom are combined is as follows (35 mm equivalent) 24-4800 mm (24-1200mm with optical zoom alone.) It can shoot RAW. Here are some of the reasons why I love the SX 50 HS

STOKES BIRDING BLOG: Canon SX 50 HS for Bird Photography: I love this camera!

 Posted by at 11:29 am
Jan 152013
 

Lillian Stokes is the finest bird photographer I know of. See her pix and read her tips. However, I have to point out that the camera she uses costs $6000, just for the body. It’s not the sole reason she’s a great photographer, but most of us will have to make do with less expensive gear (mine cost about $500 and I have a few photos I’m proud of). peace, mjh

STOKES BIRDING BLOG: Birds in Flight Photography Tips

My favorite type of bird photography is photographing birds in flight. Above are a few of my photos and here are some tips.

How do photographers get such photos? Here’s what you need

STOKES BIRDING BLOG: Birds in Flight Photography Tips

 Posted by at 1:00 pm
Aug 032012
 

I have problems with my Sony DSCX100v just over one year after I purchased it. These exposure problems are easiest to illustrate. However, the jog wheel used to change selected settings has also stopped working. (When I push it in to activate, the setting is highlighted as it should be. However, rolling the wheel does not change the setting.)

I wrote Sony and got a nice reply directing me to a website. There, I learned it will cost $111 (minimum) flat rate for out of warranty repairs. That’s about 25% of the original cost and very disappointing.

If your camera develops problems, try these steps:

  • format the memory card (after moving photos to your computer) or replace it with a new one
  • replace the battery
  • remove the battery for several minutes
  • restore factory defaults (on HX100v, this is deep under Main Settings, 2nd icon on left, 6th setting, Initialize > All Settings > OK)

None of these steps have helped with the jog wheel. (Nor did compressed air, pressing harder, or cursing.)

DSC08333

DSC08769

DSC08775

DSC08973

DSC09034

DSC09172

 Posted by at 10:50 am
Aug 112011
 

Brief review by www.digital-photography-school.com of the HX-100. For what it’s worth, I’ve never had any luck using in-camera panorama (including on the HX-1).

Sony Cybershot DSC-HX100V Review

Sony Cybershot DSC-HX100V Features

The CMOS sensor captures 16.2 million effective pixels, with a maximum still image of 4608×3456 pixels, enough to make a 39x29cm print.

Sony HX100V_3_L.JPG

Sony HX100v-3.jpg

Sony Cybershot DSC-HX100V Review

 Posted by at 7:32 pm
Jul 142011
 

I’ve posted two other examples comparing the Sony HX-100 wide angle to zoom (on Amazon). I think the first example was the best, so I should probably stop after this.

We saw a bird land in the dead cottonwood in the middle of the following frame. Do you see it?

DSC00844

Full zoom reveals a great blue heron. At the time, I could barely see the heron on the electronic viewfinder (EVF) .

DSC00846

The final photo is cropped from the second. That’s the full size. (To see the full size of the first two photos, click each.) Yes, it’s a little soft, but still pretty cool. Love this camera. (Can’t wait for Sony to put a larger sensor in one of these non-DSLRs.)

DSC00846 (2)

Sony HX-100 Wide (27mm) to Zoom (30X, 810mm) in photos and video Wed 07/06/11 (with a video)

More examples of Sony HX-100 Zoom / Super-zoom Wed 07/13/11

 Posted by at 2:54 pm
Jul 132011
 

I posted other examples comparing the HX-100’s wide angle to its 30X zoom (~810mm), including video. Below are a few more.

This first shot is wide angle. You may be able to make out the sunflower. Note: I should have used the HX100’s HDR backlit setting for better exposure of the foreground.

wide angle

From the same spot, I zoomed in on the sunflower. The following photo is the uncropped frame.

zoom

The third shot is cropped from the second. Note the ant at the end of one of the rays. Go back to the first photo and find the ant!

zoom

The next shot is full zoom, hand-held at sunset on a cloudy day.

DSC00770

This is a cropped portion of that preceding shot. Not as sharp as I’d like (my standing complaint about Sony zooms in less than bright sunlight) but surprisingly legible (if you click the photo). At the time, I couldn’t even tell it was a UPS plane; it was five to ten miles away.

DSC00770 (2)

 Posted by at 9:21 am
Jul 062011
 

These three photos demonstrate the range of the 30X zoom on the new Sony HX-100v, a “bridge” or high-end point-and-shoot digital camera (P&S). (No one says “prosumer” anymore.)

DSC00614 4.8mm (normal, wide angle) – said to be 27mm equivalent in 35mm terms

DSC00615 14.5mm (roughly 3X)

DSC00616 144mm (roughly 30X) – said to be 810mm equivalent in 35mm terms

The following hand-held video is a little rough, and noisy due to wind, despite the HX-100’s noise suppression feature. You may want to mute it.

demo of Sony HX-100 zoom (1min 17 sec)

2011-06 Conejos 186 2011-06 Conejos 187

17.3mm (>3X)                                 144mm (roughly 30X)

More examples

 Posted by at 10:20 am
Dec 072010
 

After nearly 3 weeks, I am returning the Fujifilm HS10 superzoom to Amazon. Although this camera has many interesting features I’d like to spend more time with, too many things make it unacceptable to me.

I bought the HS10 primarily for the 30X zoom, which ranges from a wide angle 4.2mm (24mm equivalent for 35mm cameras) to 126mm (720mm). In addition to that monster zoom, the many features that are exposed through buttons instead of buried in menus place this camera at the far edge of the bridge, just before the shores of DSLR.

Focus problems

I took hundreds of photos with the HS10. Too many were out-of-focus. I’ll accept responsibility for some of these, but not all. The camera has trouble locking focus accurately on a distant subject – precisely the subject you want 30X for. I have shots comparable to the three below but taken with a Sony HX1 that are wonderfully sharp. (And, yes, I have some blurry ones taken with other cameras, just a far lower percentage.) In the 3rd photo, that roadrunner wasn’t 15 feet from me and I took several shots varying the zoom – none came out.

blurry scrub jay HS10 blurry helicopter HS10 blurry roadrunner HS10

In Auto mode, the HS10 allows for Center focus and Manual focus. Frustrated with Center focus, I gave Manual focus a chance. The Manual focus ring around the lens harkens back to old school cameras, although the flash housing limits how much of the ring you can touch. Oddly, the focus ring spins infinitely in either direction and the on-screen indicators don’t really help in determining in which direction or how far the ring must turn. The low resolution EVF further complicates using Manual focus.

Understand, I’m not returning the camera only because of Manual focus problems. If Auto focus were reliable, I’d be happy. I should add that I can’t be certain that what I see as focus issues aren’t actually problems with image stabilization (IS), although I experimented with that feature separately. It is a lot to expect to handhold 30X (720mm equivalent), but I have plenty of experience with 20X.

Battery problems

I refuse to use non-rechargeable batteries. I’d rather pay for rechargeables. Because the HS10 uses four standard format AA batteries, I’m happy to carry a pocketful of rechargeable AAs. However, the battery level indicator doesn’t appear until the HS10 determines the batteries are low (ie, there is no meter showing declining charge). Compare this to Sony cameras which guestimates the number of minutes you have left on the battery.

I use rechargeable NiMH batteries. If I used the camera menu to indicate I was using that type of battery, the low battery indicator came on ridiculously early and the camera shut down too soon. If I used the same batteries but identified them as Alkaline, it took much longer before the low battery indicator came on. Once the low battery indicator appears, it may actually be a long time (days) before you have to switch batteries. That uncertainty makes the indicator useless. More importantly, every time the HS10 shut down abruptly, my battery tester indicated the charge on the batteries was still good enough for most devices.

A small gripe: the latch on the the battery compartment is odd. It barely moves, making it feel very strange. A nit, but an irk.

Exposure problems

Even at a wide angle, the lens requires a lot of light. Auto mode didn’t seem to handle stark contrast well, as these two photos indicate. On the left is the HS10, on the right is the Sony HX1. Of course, one can adjust either camera to produce a shot similar to the other. I’m interested here in what happens automatically. I realize someone might prefer the darker shot with the option to manually lighten it.

underexposed Fujifilm HS10 better exposed Sony HX1

Moreover, the Sony spoiled me by enabling its exposure compensation (EC) feature in Auto mode, providing the easiest way brighten or darken a shot without using other manual settings. The HS10 limits EC availability to the manual modes and adjusting EC involves using two controls simultaneously with an on-screen indicator that is difficult to interpret.

Shutter Lag

DSLR fans will say ‘duh’ to this, as shutter lag is an issue with all non-DSLRs. The more time it takes between pressing the shutter release button and the actual capture, the more likely you are to miss a moving subject. That lag with the HS10 was, at times, painful and longer than I have experienced with other cameras.

Electronic Viewfinder (EVF) problems

The EVF is very small and seems darker than other EVFs I’ve used. The HS10 has a sensor to the right of the EVF that can switch automatically between the EVF and the LCD. That seems like a great innovation, but that feature only worked sporadically. Something seemed to overwhelm the sensor, causing it to switch back and forth repeatedly, requiring me to turn the camera off. I disabled this feature after several failures.

The placement of the sensor on the right and an indicator light on the left of the EVF make me think this camera may be better suited to someone who uses the left eye instead of the right against the EVF.

Two Hands Required for Too Many Things

This is a large and relatively heavy camera. If size and weight don’t require two hands, too many of the features do. For example, selecting among options for autofocus, auto exposure, ISO, or white balance involves pressing and holding a button on the left and simultaneously turning a dial on the right. (I’m stunned you can’t just press and release the buttons.) With lots of experience, one might be able to do activate both controls while holding the EVF up one’s eye, but I had to use the LCD for most of these adjustments. (Further, many options are limited by other selections, and very few adjustments can be made in the Auto modes. That’s not terribly unusual, but it can be frustrating and makes learning harder.)

Little Things

Although the HS10 has some innovative Burst mode (aka motor drive) variants, there isn’t a method to capture as many frames as possible. Instead, the Burst mode options all involve some processing or bracketing. Regardless, the available options take a long time to free the camera for continued shooting. (I have a similar gripe with the Sony HX1.)

RAW is only available in the manual modes (PASM), but that’s OK, because writing RAW to SD HC class 6 takes a long time.

 Posted by at 12:39 pm
Dec 012010
 

The Fujifilm HS10 superzoom ranges from wide angle to 30X. In digital notation, the focal length range is 4.2mm to 126mm. In old school 35mm notation, this translates as 24mm to 720mm. These four photos (taken without moving and un-edited, of course) show 1X, 10X, 20X, and 30X.

zoom test - 1x 1X

zoom test - 10x 10X

zoom test - 20x 20X

zoom test - 30x 30X

Most non-DSLRs use a button to activate zoom electronically. Many of these cameras jump zoom levels and hitting a specific level is difficult or impossible. With the HS10, you manually turn the barrel of the lens, just like a classic film zoom lens, and the zoom level appears to be continuous (and quiet).

 Posted by at 1:00 pm
Nov 282010
 

At this point, digital cameras are like cars, computers, cellphones – most devices: There are so many choices it comes down to chance or personal preferences. The market divides cameras between Point-and-Shoot (P&S) and DSLRs. I prefer to split P&S into two categories. Therefore, consider these three categories of cameras:

  • compact, pocketable — $100 to $300
  • superzoom (aka ‘bridge’ cameras – as in, a bridge between the first and third categories) – $300 to $500
  • DSLR (digital single lens reflex)  — $500 to $5000

I think everyone should own a compact digital camera. If you don’t have one, that should be your next camera purchase. They are so handy and they are a good start to learning the details of digital cameras, both technological and photographic / compositional. Although you may find a compact under $100, a really cheap camera will almost certainly have limitations you’ll end up disliking. In this category, look for a zoom of 5X to 10X.

A superzoom is wonderful for outdoor photography of all kinds: landscapes, wildlife, sports – you name it. These cameras are larger and heavier than compacts. The zoom range starts at 10X and goes to 35X (currently). Be aware that 20X and beyond may be hard to hold steady without using a tripod.

DSLRs are for professionals who have lots of experience with photography already. Beginners should stay away from DSLRs, in my opinion. Even more experienced enthusiasts will be very well served by a superzoom. Even pros should use a superzoom. That said, DSLRs provide more options, more control, and higher quality images (mostly relevant to advanced editing and printing very large photos).

As for brands, there are simply too many choices to be fair in picking just one or two. That said, I like Sony compacts and superzooms (HX1). I would certainly consider other brands. (I just bought a Fujifilm HS10 superzoom, but it is too soon to recommend it.)

There is much more that can be said. See Chapter 1 of my book, Digital Cameras & Photography for Dummies (2nd edition). Write if you have questions.

Added 12/4/10: Here are two more Web pages you may want to read before shopping:

How to pick the perfect point-and-shoot camera

By Chris Foresman | Last updated 8 days ago

alt

If you’re in the market for a new point-and-shoot camera—whether for yourself or for someone on your holiday shopping list—the array of choices can make it difficult to find one that’s right. Here are some tips to help you narrow down the options.

How to pick the perfect point-and-shoot camera

DSLR camera buying guide | SLR | Digital Photo | Macworld

Here’s what to keep in mind when shopping for a digital single lens reflex camera

by Macworld Staff, Macworld.com   Oct 25, 2010 7:00 am

alt

For serious and professional photographers, digital single lens reflex (DSLR) cameras are the way to go. They offer faster performance,more control over settings, and better image quality than even top-of-the-line point-and-shoot cameras. Most importantly, they give you the ability to change lenses.

DSLR camera buying guide | SLR | Digital Photo | Macworld

 Posted by at 1:00 pm